In a reply to a tweet I posted
EisleyXO wrote "I feel like it’s more of a bdsm spectrum now more than ever."
There clearly is a wide spectrum of what people would consider as BDSM or D/s. At one end it may get close to an example I gave in an
earlier post about service with little or no play or sexual element. At the other end it could involve heavy sado-masochist play and a slave contract.
So what would the minimum be for a relationship to be regarded as BDSM?
EisleyXO suggested, "Creating a safe environment, pushing limits, ensuring proper after care, and giving a sub the attention they crave could be considered the bare minimum of a d/s dynamic..."
I could agree with most of this but is "pushing limits" an essential part of a BDSM relationship? Though that is perhaps getting into a different discussion. (Perhaps next week!)
For now I wonder what others regard as the bare minimum for a dynamic to be considered BDSM?